Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Changing clinicians’ beliefs about treatment for children experiencing trauma: The impact of intensive training in an evidence-based, trauma-focused treatment.

Authors: Brian Allen; Kelly L. Wilson; Natalie E. Armstrong;

Changing clinicians’ beliefs about treatment for children experiencing trauma: The impact of intensive training in an evidence-based, trauma-focused treatment.

Abstract

The child trauma field has seen a steady change in policy, funding priorities and dissemination efforts toward the implementation of evidence-based treatments (EBTs). Despite this shift, many clinicians remain untrained in these practices, which may speak to both a lack of awareness regarding this shift, and difficulty altering their fundamental beliefs about how therapy should be conducted. The current study sought to examine whether clinicians’ fundamental beliefs regarding a nondirective/unstructured or directive/structured approach to therapy, and children’s abilities to verbally express their trauma, could change after undergoing intensive training in a trauma-focused EBT. Results showed that clinicians receiving intensive training in Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT) reported a significant shift toward holding a more structured/directive approach to treatment, and a greater belief that children are capable of verbally describing their traumatic experiences. Clinicians not receiving the training demonstrated no changes in their beliefs. These results are discussed in the context of encouraging greater utilization of EBTs.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    11
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
11
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!