
doi: 10.1037/a0033814
pmid: 24377406
We examined the effect of Systemic Couple Therapy on a patient diagnosed with dysthymic disorder and her partner. Marge and Peter, a middle-aged married couple, showed significant and meaningful changes in their pattern of interaction over the course of the therapy and, by the end of it, Marge no longer met the diagnostic criteria for dysthymic disorder. Her scores on the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I) and Beck Depression Inventory, Second Edition (BDI-II) were in the clinical range before treatment and in the nonclinical one at the end of therapy. Although scores on Dyadic Adjustment Scale showed different patterns, both members reported significant improvement. The analysis of change in the alliance-related behaviors throughout the process concurred with change in couple's pattern of interaction. Treatment effects were maintained at 12-month follow-up. Highlights in the therapy process showed the importance of relational mechanisms of change, such as broadening the therapeutic focus into the couple's pattern of interaction, reducing expressed emotion and resentment, as well as increasing positive exchanges. The results of this evidence-based case study should prompt further investigation of couple therapy for dysthymia disorder. Randomized clinical trial design is needed to reach an evidence-based treatment status.
Male, Family Conflict, Personality Inventory, Communication, Mentors, Psychotherapy, Multiple, Professional-Patient Relations, Middle Aged, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Expressed Emotion, Evidence-Based Practice, Humans, Female, Dysthymic Disorder, Marital Therapy, Marriage, Follow-Up Studies
Male, Family Conflict, Personality Inventory, Communication, Mentors, Psychotherapy, Multiple, Professional-Patient Relations, Middle Aged, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Expressed Emotion, Evidence-Based Practice, Humans, Female, Dysthymic Disorder, Marital Therapy, Marriage, Follow-Up Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
