
doi: 10.1021/jf034384z
pmid: 14611177
The sensorial quality of solid phase microextraction (SPME) flavor extracts from orange juice was measured by direct gas chromatogrphy-olfactometry (D-GC-O), a novel instrumental tool for evaluating odors from headspace extracts. In general, odor impressions emerging from SPME extracts poorly resembled that of the original orange juice. In an attempt to improve the sensorial quality of extracts, sample equilibration and exposure times were varied on Carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane (CAR/PDMS) and divinylbenzene/Carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane (DVB/CAR/PDMS) SPME fibers. Best sensorial results were obtained with the DVB/CAR/PDMS fiber exposed for the shortest time; a trained panel of eight assessors judged its odor as the most representative of the reference orange juice. The analysis of odor active compounds by classical GC-O accounted for odor characteristics revealed by D-GC-O. A principal component analysis (PCA) was applied on SPME and headspace extracts using flavor recoveries as variables. Interestingly, PCA discriminated samples according to their odor representations described by D-GC-O analysis. This paper provides the first comprehensive methodology to "smell" SPME extracts and "evaluate" their sensorial quality. This method will enable future investigations to further improve SPME performance.
Beverages, Smell, Chromatography, Gas, Fruit, [SDV.IDA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Food engineering, Odorants, Humans, [SDV.IDA] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Food engineering, 540, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Citrus sinensis
Beverages, Smell, Chromatography, Gas, Fruit, [SDV.IDA]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Food engineering, Odorants, Humans, [SDV.IDA] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Food engineering, 540, Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, Citrus sinensis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 112 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
