
doi: 10.1017/jsl.2013.39
AbstractThe resurrection axioms are forms of forcing axioms that were introduced recently by Hamkins and Johnstone, who developed on earlier ideas of Chalons and Veličković. In this note, we introduce a stronger form of resurrection (which we callunboundedresurrection) and show that it gives rise to families of axioms which are consistent relative to extendible cardinals, and which imply the strongest known instances of forcing axioms, such as Martin’s Maximum++. In addition, we study the unbounded resurrection postulates in terms of consistency lower bounds, obtaining, for example, failures of the weak square principle.
Generic absoluteness and forcing axioms, Large cardinals, forcing axioms, extendible cardinals, Consistency and independence results, weak square principle, Martin's \(\text{maximum}^{++}\), resurrection axioms
Generic absoluteness and forcing axioms, Large cardinals, forcing axioms, extendible cardinals, Consistency and independence results, weak square principle, Martin's \(\text{maximum}^{++}\), resurrection axioms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
