Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Linguaarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Lingua
Article . 1997 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

The continuity paradox and emergent linguistic structure: Discontinuous sortal concepts versus the innate syntax hypothesis

Authors: Alan Manning; Iris Gomez;

The continuity paradox and emergent linguistic structure: Discontinuous sortal concepts versus the innate syntax hypothesis

Abstract

Abstract Sortal concepts provide children with criteria for the categorical differentiation of count nouns and mass nouns in languages with a count/mass distinction. This article discusses the paradox encountered by Carey in her empirical studies of the continuity hypothesis , the view that innate infant perception of qualities and objects is identical to adult categorization in general (e.g. Pinker, 1984; McNamara, 1982). This view contrasts with the discontinuity hypothesis , the view that infant perception of qualities and objects is of an entirely different order from adult conceptualization of categorization and sortal plurality (e.g. Quine, 1960, 1969, 1973). Unfortunately, Carey's interpretation of her empirical studies leads to a paradox: she finds evidence for both continuity and discontinuity. Contrary to Quine's predictions, she finds evidence for adult-like infant perception of persistent physical objects by 4 months of age, but finds that children do not perceive ‘other kinds’ of sortal classification in an adult-like way until at least, 11 months of age, a surprising discontinuity. We argue that Quine and Carey both erroneously construe the perception of persistent physical objects as a sortal concept. We deploy the semiotic theory of C.S. Peirce (1839–1914) to analyze the studies presented by Carey and thereby reconcile the paradoxical interpretations of her empirical evidence. Contrary to Quine and Carey's common assumption, we claim that children's perception of physical objects (part of Peirce's proposed second category of innate conceptualization) is independent from the later development of true sortal categorization (a derived complication of Peirce's third innate category). In the Peircean analysis there is a fundamental continuity in the overall process of conceptual and linguistic acquisition from birth to adulthood, but at the same time, the Peircean model accounts for differences in cognitive and linguistic abilities empirically demonstrated to exist, between infants, young children, and adults.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!