
pmid: 26411613
In recent years the term 'Lamarckian evolution' has become a household name for processes that do not follow classical Mendelian pattern of inheritance, and it is seen as a relevant complement to Darwinism. In this article I argue that bringing back Lamarck is unjustified and misleading.
106002 Biochemie, 106002 Biochemistry, Adaptive Immunity, EVOLUTION, Epigenesis, Genetic, Evolution, Molecular, Prokaryotic Cells, CRISPR, Darwinism, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats, Lamarckism, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
106002 Biochemie, 106002 Biochemistry, Adaptive Immunity, EVOLUTION, Epigenesis, Genetic, Evolution, Molecular, Prokaryotic Cells, CRISPR, Darwinism, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats, Lamarckism, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
