
pmid: 16904143
It is shown that, in the capture-recapture method, the widely used formulae of Bailey or Chapman-Seber give the most likely value for the size of the population, but systematically underestimate the probability that the population is larger than any given size. We take here a first step in a combinatorial approach which does not suffer from this flaw: formulae are given which can be used in the closed case (no birth, death or migrations between captures) when at least two animals have been recaptured and when there is homogeneity with regard to capture probability. Numerical and heuristic evidence is presented pointing to the fact that the error incurred when using the formulae of Bailey or Chapman-Seber depends asymptotically only on the number of recaptured animals, and will not diminish if the number of captured animals becomes large while the number of recaptured animals remains constant. A result that was stated and left unproven by Darroch is proven here.
Population Density, Analysis of Variance, Combinatorial probability, Biometry, Models, Statistical, hypergeometric, Bayesian inference, capture-recapture, Information Theory, Bayes Theorem, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, Bias, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Sample Size, Sampling theory, sample surveys, Animals, Applications of statistics to environmental and related topics, Mathematics, Probability
Population Density, Analysis of Variance, Combinatorial probability, Biometry, Models, Statistical, hypergeometric, Bayesian inference, capture-recapture, Information Theory, Bayes Theorem, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, Bias, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Sample Size, Sampling theory, sample surveys, Animals, Applications of statistics to environmental and related topics, Mathematics, Probability
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
