
arXiv: 1607.02758
handle: 10138/307547 , 20.500.11769/614310
Population Monte Carlo (PMC) sampling methods are powerful tools for approximating distributions of static unknowns given a set of observations. These methods are iterative in nature: at each step they generate samples from a proposal distribution and assign them weights according to the importance sampling principle. Critical issues in applying PMC methods are the choice of the generating functions for the samples and the avoidance of the sample degeneracy. In this paper, we propose three new schemes that considerably improve the performance of the original PMC formulation by allowing for better exploration of the space of unknowns and by selecting more adequately the surviving samples. A theoretical analysis is performed, proving the superiority of the novel schemes in terms of variance of the associated estimators and preservation of the sample diversity. Furthermore, we show that they outperform other state of the art algorithms (both in terms of mean square error and robustness w.r.t. initialization) through extensive numerical simulations.
Signal Processing, 2016
Population Monte Carlo, FOS: Computer and information sciences, Resampling, PARTICLE FILTERS, Proposal distribution, Statistics - Computation, Adaptive importance sampling, [INFO.INFO-TS]Computer Science [cs]/Signal and Image Processing, SAMPLING SCHEMES, [SPI.SIGNAL]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Signal and Image processing, Mathematics, Computation (stat.CO)
Population Monte Carlo, FOS: Computer and information sciences, Resampling, PARTICLE FILTERS, Proposal distribution, Statistics - Computation, Adaptive importance sampling, [INFO.INFO-TS]Computer Science [cs]/Signal and Image Processing, SAMPLING SCHEMES, [SPI.SIGNAL]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Signal and Image processing, Mathematics, Computation (stat.CO)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 75 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
