Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Scientia Horticultur...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Scientia Horticulturae
Article . 2016 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Post emergence herbicides influence the leaf yield, chlorophyll fluorescence and phenolic compounds of artichoke (Cynara cardunculus L.)

Authors: Sajid Ali; Bernd Honermeier;

Post emergence herbicides influence the leaf yield, chlorophyll fluorescence and phenolic compounds of artichoke (Cynara cardunculus L.)

Abstract

Abstract We examined the effects of herbicides on leaf yield, chlorophyll fluorescence and phenolic compounds of artichoke (Cynara cardunculus L.) under field conditions during 2006 and 2007 at the Institute of Agronomy and Plant Breeding I, Giessen, Germany (50°36′N and 8°39′E). Artichoke (cv. Gobbo di Nizza) was cultivated in a randomized complete block replicated four times in 75 cm rows. The treatments included five herbicides (haloxyfop, phenmedipham, pyridate, quizalofop-P and prosulfocarb), applied after germination, and a mechanically weeded control. The crop was harvested two times in both experimental years. Pyridate (phenyl-pyridazine) affected the artichoke crop most adversely in both years, and resulted in minimum leaf yield during both growth phases of 2006 and second growth phase of 2007. In general, the second phase of artichoke growth resulted in higher leaf yield than that of the first phase in 2006; whereas, opposite results were obtained in 2007. Chlorophyll fluorescence measurements showed that top two damage causing herbicides were Pyridate and Phenmedipham. Visual toxicity observations showed the same trend as that of photosynthetic data. The toxic effect of the herbicide was recovered during the growth cycle of the crop depending on the prevailing environmental conditions. Phenolic compounds differed during different growth phases and experimental years. Quizalofop-p application increased falvonoids content in artichoke leaves at the first harvest compared to untreated control and other herbicide treatments.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    13
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
13
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!