
handle: 1959.4/50535
Abstract Cognitive load theorists have frequently used subjective measures of cognitive load to test the effectiveness of instructional procedures. This study sought to broaden the applications of subjective measures by testing their ability to detect variations in intrinsic cognitive load within tasks. In two experiments students were asked to complete algebraic problems and provide a subjective measure of cognitive load for each computation completed. By keeping extraneous and germane cognitive load constant, it was argued that changes in intrinsic cognitive load (element interactivity) were measured. Results showed that subjective measures were highly reliable, varied significantly within problems and correlated highly with errors. Evidence was also found that the subjective measures were influenced by the expertise of the learner and procedural errors.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 260 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
