
pmid: 23244821
Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) has been suggested by some researchers as a method to capture the benefits beyond quality adjusted life-years in a transparent and consistent manner. The objectives of this article were to analyze the possible application of MCDA approaches in health technology assessment and to describe their relative advantages and disadvantages.This article begins with an introduction to the most common types of MCDA models and a critical review of state-of-the-art methods for incorporating multiple criteria in health technology assessment. An overview of MCDA is provided and is compared against the current UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence health technology appraisal process. A generic MCDA modeling approach is described, and the different MCDA modeling approaches are applied to a hypothetical case study.A comparison of the different MCDA approaches is provided, and the generic issues that need consideration before the application of MCDA in health technology assessment are examined.There are general practical issues that might arise from using an MCDA approach, and it is suggested that appropriate care be taken to ensure the success of MCDA techniques in the appraisal process.
Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Health Policy, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, decision making, Decision Support Techniques, Models, Economic, Research Design, health economics, Humans, health technology assessment, [SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance, multiple criteria decision analysis
Technology Assessment, Biomedical, Health Policy, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, decision making, Decision Support Techniques, Models, Economic, Research Design, health economics, Humans, health technology assessment, [SHS.ECO] Humanities and Social Sciences/Economics and Finance, multiple criteria decision analysis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 251 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
