
Abstract Cooperative undertakings account for a substantial share of developed market economies and that share is likely to grow with the advent of the new economy. The paper develops a dynamic investment framework that relates access policies, financing and growth of cooperatives. It shows how discriminating among users affects the viability of cooperatives and impacts social efficiency. It then argues that in most circumstances, the cooperative form, even when viable on a stand-alone basis, is a weak competitor against alternative organizational forms. Last, the paper stresses that access policies involve a standard social trade-off between static efficiency and innovation.
330, INVESTMENT, [SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences, DISCRIMINATION, [SHS] Humanities and Social Sciences, COOPERATIVES, OPEN ACCESS, B- ECONOMIE ET FINANCE, jel: jel:L2, jel: jel:L3, jel: jel:D7
330, INVESTMENT, [SHS]Humanities and Social Sciences, DISCRIMINATION, [SHS] Humanities and Social Sciences, COOPERATIVES, OPEN ACCESS, B- ECONOMIE ET FINANCE, jel: jel:L2, jel: jel:L3, jel: jel:D7
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 62 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
