Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Field Crops Researcharrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Field Crops Research
Article . 2012 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
UQ eSpace
Article . 2012
Data sources: UQ eSpace
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Genotype×environment interactions for root depth of wheat

Authors: Botwright Acuna, T. L.; Wade, L. J.;

Genotype×environment interactions for root depth of wheat

Abstract

Numerous studies have reported on genotype x environment (G x E) interactions for yield and components of yield, but none to our knowledge have attempted to use this approach for root traits. G x E interactions for root depth were assessed for 24 wheat genotypes over six field environments with contrasting soil physical characteristics in the low rainfall zone (ca. 320 mm) of Western Australia. Genotype accounted for only 12% of total variance compared with 40% for G x E interaction. Three environment and six genotype groups were identified, which accounted for 72% of the G x E sums of squares. Of this, AX1, AX2 and AX3 accounted for 30, 24 and 18% of the G x E-SS. respectively. We consider axes AX1 and AX2 to be representative of soil physical characteristics of either a sudden or gradual increase in soil strength with depth, respectively, which constrained root growth. AX3 was linked with other soil parameters related to root growth, possibly boron sensitivity. The three environment groups were defined according to their soil physical characteristics broadly grouped into low (E2), medium (El)) or high (E3) soil strength. The majority of the genotype groups aligned along the diagonal from negative for AX1 and AX2 in the lower left to positive for AX1 and AX2 in the upper right. Genotype groups containing Halberd (G3) and Machete (G5) were better adapted to soil physical constraint and vice versa for Cranbrook (G2) and C18 (G6) groups. The Janz group (G4) was mapped most negative for both axes, indicating an adaptive preference for friable soils. The Spear group (G1) exhibited a preferential adaptation to soil conditions in which a hardpan was encountered, or in which physical constraint increased early or suddenly. These results indicate that different root traits combinations are required for different target soil environments, as G x E for root depth was significant.

Country
Australia
Keywords

Triticum aestivum L, Roots, 630, G × E, Traffic pan, 1102 Agronomy and Crop Science, 1111 Soil Science, Triticum aestivum L.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    42
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
42
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!