Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Crop Protectionarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Crop Protection
Article . 2016 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Variation in the responses of melon and watermelon to Macrophomina phaseolina

Authors: Roni Cohen; Meital Elkabetz; Menahem Edelstein;

Variation in the responses of melon and watermelon to Macrophomina phaseolina

Abstract

Abstract Macrophomina phaseolina is the causal agent of charcoal rot disease, which attacks many plant species, including those in the Cucurbitaceae. The fungus is frequently isolated from wilted melon and watermelon plants in Israel. Nevertheless, the role of M. phaseolina in disease progress and induction of wilting or yield reduction in watermelons and melons is not clear and not similar. Precise disease identification is important in order to suggest effective control measures. The objective of the current study was therefore to investigate disease progress and document its damage in watermelon and melon. Watermelons and melons were seeded in a field naturally infested with M. phaseolina and in the greenhouse in 10-L pots containing dune sand. Plants were inoculated at 35 days of age using two methods: drenching with macerated fungus around the crown area or stabbing the lower stem with an M. phaseolina- infested toothpick. Disease progress was documented in the field and in the greenhouse. Plant colonization and symptom development were more pronounced in melon than in watermelon. Large lesions and significant internal rotting developed in melon plants inoculated by the two methods in both field and greenhouse. In watermelon, however, no lesions or internal rotting were observed. Disease effect on melons and watermelons was observed only in the field, a short time before harvest, and was expressed as partial wilting and significant loss of shoot and fruit fresh weight similarly to disease appearance under natural infection. No wilting of melons or watermelons was observed in the greenhouse experiment.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    37
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
37
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!