Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Computers & Educatio...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Computers & Education
Article . 2018 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
DBLP
Article . 2025
Data sources: DBLP
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The effect of presentation mode on children's reading preferences, performance, and self-evaluations

Authors: Danielle Dahan Golan; Mirit Barzillai; Tami Katzir;

The effect of presentation mode on children's reading preferences, performance, and self-evaluations

Abstract

Abstract There has been a significant rise in the use of computers and electronic devices for reading in both personal and educational settings. Work on the effects of presentation modality on reading performance and self-evaluation has explored these issues with adults (e.g., Ackerman & Goldsmith, 2011; Ackerman & Lauterman, 2012; Singer & Alexander, 2016) and with adolescents (e.g., Mangen, Walgermo, & Bronnick, 2013; Rasmusson, 2014). Less is known about how children's reading preferences, performance, and self-evaluations are affected by screen vs. print tasks. In this study, 82 fifth and sixth grade students read texts on a computer screen and on paper. They answered comprehension questions and rated their confidence in their answers. In addition, they completed preference questionnaires prior to and after the task. Results indicated that children prefer reading from a screen. They performed significantly better on paper and were more confident and calibrated than when reading from a screen. Finally, post-task preference questionnaires indicated that children's preference for screen reading decreased from pre to post test. Theoretical and pedagogical implications are discussed.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    69
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
69
Top 1%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!