
In this article we consider the ''design for orchestration'' concept and introduce a set of notions to clarify matters of concern. We propose to distinguish orchestration technology and orchestrable technology, to define orchestration as a combination of scripting and conducting, and to differentiate primo-scripting and run-time scripting. As a way to see how these different notions relate one to another, we take the example of CSCL scripts.
[INFO.EIAH] Computer Science [cs]/Technology for Human Learning, [SHS.EDU]Humanities and Social Sciences/Education, Scripting, Conducting, [SHS.EDU] Humanities and Social Sciences/Education, Orchestration, [INFO.EIAH]Computer Science [cs]/Technology for Human Learning, Orchestration technology, Orchestrable technology
[INFO.EIAH] Computer Science [cs]/Technology for Human Learning, [SHS.EDU]Humanities and Social Sciences/Education, Scripting, Conducting, [SHS.EDU] Humanities and Social Sciences/Education, Orchestration, [INFO.EIAH]Computer Science [cs]/Technology for Human Learning, Orchestration technology, Orchestrable technology
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 38 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
