Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Computers and Electr...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Article . 2017 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
DBLP
Article . 2017
Data sources: DBLP
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A ground based platform for high throughput phenotyping

Authors: Juan Enciso; Murilo M. Maeda; Juan Landivar 0001; Jinha Jung; Anjin Chang;

A ground based platform for high throughput phenotyping

Abstract

Abstract The objective of this effort was to evaluate current commercially-available sensor technology (three sonic ranging and two NDVI sensors) for use in a ground-based platform for plant phenotyping and crop management decisions. The Global Positioning System (GPS) receiver from Trimble provided a high level of accuracy during our tests. Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) data collected using the GreenSeeker sensors were more consistent and presented less variability when compared to the Decagon SRS sensor. The consistency could be due to the GreenSeeker system averaging readings of more rows. The tests also indicated that although sonic ranging sensor technology may be employed to obtain average plant height estimates, the technology is still a limiting factor for high-accuracy measurements at the plant level.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    15
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
15
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!