
pmid: 25256464
Although considerable information is available about amylolysis rate, extent and pattern of granular starches, the underlying mechanisms of enzyme action and interactions are not fully understood, partly due to the lack of direct visualisation of enzyme binding and subsequent hydrolysis of starch granules. In the present study, α-amylase (AA) from porcine pancreas was labelled with either fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) or tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC) fluorescent dye with maintenance of significant enzyme activity. The binding of FITC/TRITC-AA conjugate to the surface and interior of granules was studied under both non-hydrolysing (0 °C) and hydrolysing (37 °C) conditions with confocal microscopy. It was observed that enzyme binding to maize starch granules under both conditions was more homogenous compared with potato starch. Enzyme molecules appear to preferentially bind to the granules or part of granules that are more susceptible to enzymic degradation. The specificity is such that fresh enzyme added after a certain time of incubation binds at the same location as previously bound enzyme. By visualising the enzyme location during binding and hydrolysis, detailed information is provided regarding the heterogeneity of granular starch digestion.
Binding Sites, Hydrolysis, Sus scrofa, Temperature, Alpha-amylase, Surface structure, Starch, 540, 2507 Polymers and Plastics, Zea mays, Starch granules, Confocal microscopy, Enzyme binding, 2700 Medicine, Animals, alpha-Amylases, Pancreas, 2505 Materials Chemistry, 1605 Organic Chemistry, Solanum tuberosum
Binding Sites, Hydrolysis, Sus scrofa, Temperature, Alpha-amylase, Surface structure, Starch, 540, 2507 Polymers and Plastics, Zea mays, Starch granules, Confocal microscopy, Enzyme binding, 2700 Medicine, Animals, alpha-Amylases, Pancreas, 2505 Materials Chemistry, 1605 Organic Chemistry, Solanum tuberosum
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 62 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
