
This paper presents a review of past and present results and approaches in the area of motion planning using MIP (Mixed-integer Programming). Although in the early 2000s MIP was still seen with reluctance as method for solving motion planning-related problems, nowadays, due to increases in computational power and theoretical advances, its extensive modeling capabilities and versatility are coming to the fore and enjoy increased application and appreciation. This class of control problems involves, essentially, either a selection from a limited number of alternatives or a constrained optimization problem over a non-convex domain. In both situations, MIP has proven to be an efficient modeling technique as it will be shown in the present review paper. Furthermore, an emphasis is laid on the existing alternatives for implementation and on various experimental validations documented in the literature.
[SPI]Engineering Sciences [physics], [SPI] Engineering Sciences [physics], 004
[SPI]Engineering Sciences [physics], [SPI] Engineering Sciences [physics], 004
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 79 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
