
arXiv: 1601.06635
The Smagorinsky model, unmodified, is often reported to severely overdiffuse flows. Previous estimates of the energy dissipation rate of the Smagorinsky model for shear flows reflect a blow up of model energy dissipation as Re increases. This blow up is consistent with the numerical evidence and leads to the question: Is the over dissipation due to the influence of the turbulent viscosity in boundary layers alone or is its action on small scales generated by the nonlinearity through the cascade also a contributor? This report develops model dissipation estimates for body force driven flow under periodic boundary conditions (and thus only with nonlinearity generated small scales). It is proven that the model's time averaged energy dissipation rate satisfies the same upper bound as for the NSE plus one additional term that vanishes uniformly in the Reynolds number as the Smagorinsky length scale decreases. Since this estimate is consistent with that observed for the NSE, it establishes that, without boundary layers, the Smagorinsky model does not over dissipate.
This is an expanded version of a note with a similar title
turbulence, Direct numerical and large eddy simulation of turbulence, Fluid Dynamics (physics.flu-dyn), FOS: Physical sciences, Physics - Fluid Dynamics, Numerical Analysis (math.NA), PDEs in connection with fluid mechanics, energy dissipation rate, Fundamentals of turbulence, FOS: Mathematics, Smagorinsky model, Mathematics - Numerical Analysis, Singular perturbations in context of PDEs
turbulence, Direct numerical and large eddy simulation of turbulence, Fluid Dynamics (physics.flu-dyn), FOS: Physical sciences, Physics - Fluid Dynamics, Numerical Analysis (math.NA), PDEs in connection with fluid mechanics, energy dissipation rate, Fundamentals of turbulence, FOS: Mathematics, Smagorinsky model, Mathematics - Numerical Analysis, Singular perturbations in context of PDEs
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
