
We examine a set of specific criteria designed to test hypotheses about the membership of observations to the uniform law. We studied the distribution of statistics of criteria and their power relative to various competing hypotheses. We identified advantages and disadvantages of the various criteria. It has been shown that a significant part of the criteria traditionally used when testing hypotheses about uniformity, is ectopic relative to a certain type of competing hypotheses. It is stressed that the special criteria for testing uniformity have no obvious advantages over non-parametric agreement criteria used for checking uniformity.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
