Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Oecologiaarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Oecologia
Article . 1997 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Interference among cotton neighbours after differential reproductive damage

Authors: Victor O, Sadras;

Interference among cotton neighbours after differential reproductive damage

Abstract

In indeterminate plant species, the rate of vegetative growth usually declines during the stage of active reproductive growth. Fruit shedding, as induced by insect herbivores, could counteract this decline. Due to the relative increase in vegetative growth, plants that have suffered reproductive damage could be better able to intercept light and acquire soil resources than undamaged plants. If so, plants with damaged neighbours might grow less than their counterparts with smaller, undamaged neighbours. This hypothesis was tested in high- and low-density cotton crops subjected to three treatments: (i) undamaged controls; (ii) uniformly damaged, in which all plants were damaged; (iii) non-uniformly damaged, in which every second plant was damaged. Damaged plants had their flowerbuds and young fruits manually removed at 85 days after sowing to simulate shedding as induced by Helicoverpa spp. (Lepidoptera) and mirid bugs (Hemiptera). As expected, damaged plants had greater leaf area and more vegetative dry matter than undamaged ones. This was most pronounced at high plant density. Neighbour status did not affect vegetative growth but it had a substantial, asymmetric effect on the reproductive growth of target plants. Damaged targets recovered to the level of undamaged controls in terms of total fruit number but had a large reduction in the mass of mature fruit due to the limited time available for recovery. The effect of neighbour status, if any, on the production of mature fruit in damaged targets was overridden by the limit imposed to recovery by the duration of the growing season. In contrast, neighbour status affected the production of mature fruit of undamaged targets: undamaged targets with damaged neighbours had 34% (low density) and 56% (high density) less mature fruit mass than their counterparts with undamaged neighbours. This was because (i) reproductive allocation and (ii) the proportion of total fruit that reached maturity in target plants declined with increasing neighbour interference. Most studies dealing with changes in competitive relationships among plants subjected to differential herbivory have shown how undamaged plants may benefit from herbivores that feed on their neighbours. This study shows that differential reproductive damage can cause the opposite effect, as undamaged plants may have a significant reduction in productivity due to the influence of neighbours whose vegetative growth was stimulated by the loss of reproductive organs.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    8
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
8
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!