Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Plantaarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Planta
Article . 1997 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Why do leaves and leaf cells of N-limited barley elongate at reduced rates?

Authors: Wieland Fricke; A. James S. McDonald; Lisbeth Mattson-Djos;

Why do leaves and leaf cells of N-limited barley elongate at reduced rates?

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to assess whether, in barley, nitrogen supply limits the rate of leaf elongation through a reduction in (relative) cell elongation rate and whether this is attributable to a reduced turgor, a reduced availability of osmolytes or, by implication, changed wall properties. Plants were grown on full-strength Hoagland solution (“Hoagland”-plants), or on N-deficient Hoagland solution while receiving N at a relative addition rate of 16 or 8% N · plant-N−1 · d−1 (“16%-” and “8%-plants”). Hoagland-plants were demand-limited, whereas 16%- and 8%-plants were supply-limited in N. Third leaves were analysed for leaf elongation rate and final epidermal cell length, and, within the basal growing region, for the spatial distribution of relative segmental elongation rates (RSER, pin-pricking method), epidermal cell turgor (cell-pressure probe), osmotic pressure (OP, picolitre osmometry) and water potential (Ψ). During the development of the third leaf, plants grew at relative growth rates (relative increase in fresh weight ) of 18.2, 15.6 and 8.1% · d−1 (Hoagland-, 16%- and 8%-plants, respectively). Final leaf length and leaf elongation rate were highest in Hoagland plants (ca. 34.1 cm and 2.33–2.60 mm · h−1, respectively), intermediate in 16%- plants (31.0 cm and 1.89–1.96 mm · h−1) and lowest in 8%-plants (29.4 cm and 1.41–1.58 mm · h−1). These differences were accompanied by only small differences in final cell length, but large differences in cell-flux rates (146, 187 and 201 cells · cell-file−1 · d−1 in 8%-, 16%- and Hoagland-plants, respectively). The length of the growth zone (32–38 mm) was not much affected by N-levels (and nutrient technique). A decrease in RSER in the growth zone distal to 10 mm produced the significant effect of N-levels on leaf elongation rate. In all treatments, cell turgor was almost constant throughout the growing region, as were cell OP and Ψ in 16%- and 8%-plants. In Hoagland-plants, however, cell OP increased by ca. 0.1 MPa within the zone of highest elongation rates and, as a consequence, cell Ψ decreased simultaneously by 0.1 MPa. Cell Ψ increased considerably where elongation ceased. Within the zone where differences in RSERs were highest between treatments (10–34 mm from base) average turgor was lowest, OP highest and Ψ most negative in Hoagland- compared to 8%- and 16%-plants (P < 0.001), but not significantly different between 8%- and 16%-plants.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    60
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
60
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!