
doi: 10.1007/bf03394558
Trials for food-deprived pigeons began with the illumination of the grain feeder lamp. On a random one-half of the trials, the feeder tray was raised so that the bird could eat. After a delay, which varied between 0 and 25 sec., two response keys were illuminated, one with red and one with green light. Pecking the red (green) key produced grain reinforcement if the trial had started with food (no food); pecking red after no food and green after food was not reinforced. Pecking was controlled by these conditional relations among stimuli, even at the longer delay intervals. Control of pecking was not different on trials that began with food and no food. These results are consistent with a body of literature which suggests that food-related events are memorable.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
