
Normally a discipline either inherits its title from its subject matter, witness for ex ample Egyptology, Classical Archaeology, or more vaguely Prehistoric Archaeology, or it inherits it from its basic approach to its subject matter. In the latter category would fall such neologisms as "new archaeology'' and "processual archaeology". Since there is no evidence of anything particularly new about the basic approaches used in our discipline from either an anthropological or historical point of view, it is obvious that our field must follow the normal pattern and be named after its subject matter.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 40 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
