
doi: 10.1007/bf03026117
In a very popular way the author discusses the problem of division of seats in some assembly between parties provided the number of votes received by these parties at the elections is known. The author shows why the proportional distribution is not adequate and discusses different quota methods, e.g. D'Hondt's rule, Droop quota etc. and their properties. Finally he proposes an algorithm of seats allocation and proves in a theorem that this algorithm ''results in each party receiving at least its Droop minimum of seats, unless every party has an exact number of Droop quotas of votes''.
algorithm of seats allocation, Mathematical sociology (including anthropology), Other natural sciences (mathematical treatment), Social choice, D'Hondt's rule, Droop quota, Droop minimum of seats
algorithm of seats allocation, Mathematical sociology (including anthropology), Other natural sciences (mathematical treatment), Social choice, D'Hondt's rule, Droop quota, Droop minimum of seats
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
