Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao American Potato Jour...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
American Potato Journal
Article . 1926 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Mosaic versus leafroll

Authors: B. A. Brown;

Mosaic versus leafroll

Abstract

I t has become increas ingly evident tha t the to ta l percentage of degenera t ive diseases in a s train of po ta toes is not an accurate measure of the value of the strain for seed. Th i s is especially evident when the amoun t of diseases is quite large, tha t is, more than is usual ly found in certified stock. Of ten one strain will ca r ry only leafroll and ano ther only mosaic, yet their total percentages of diseased plants are the same. An in teres t ing quest ion to table stock growers is ,--~Vhich has the grea ter effect in decreasing yields ? in Bulletilr 126 of the Storrs Agr icul tura l E x p e r i m e n t Station, the average yields of hills of the same strain of potatoeS, effected with mosaic or leafroll, are given as 0.58 and 0.33 pounds respectively. This indicates tha t leafroll is much more impor tan t than mosaic in reducing the yields. Some recent data corroborate this opinion. In g rowing over one hundred strains of po ta toes each year in the source oi seed tests at Storrs, condit ions are propi t ious for the spread of degenera t ive diseases, for there are a lways at least a few strains car ry ing large percentages of those troubles. Near ly all the plants usually become infected if g rown in the test plots for four or five years. New seed of a certain strain of Green Mounta ins has been obtained f rom Maine each year since 1922. Seed has been saved at d igg ing t ime each season, so that the 1925 series of plots contained new, one year old, two year old, and three year old substrains. S t range ly enough the s tock g rown here for three years outyielded by twen ty -e igh t bushels per acre that g rown here for two years. Th is was so unusual tha t a reason was sought to explain it. T h e total percentages of diseases were pract ical ly the same,--40.5 and 39.5, but the diseases cons t i tu t ing that total were ent irely different. These are shown in the fol lowing table and indicate that the twen ty four per cent difference in leafroll was much more impor tan t than the 22.5 per cent difference in mosaic.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!