
doi: 10.1007/bf02768356
ECTJ, VOL. 34, NO. 1, PAGES 3-7 ISSN 0148-5806 I recently served as review editor on an article submitted to ECTJ by Richard Clark titled "Evidence for Confounding in Computer-Based Instruction Studies: Analyzing the Meta Analyses," (Clark, 1985). While I fussed over some aspects of the first draft, I thought Clark did a good job of highlighting some of the issues involved in comparing computer-based instruction (CBI) with "traditional" instruction (TI) (or, for that matter, comparing any instructional media and/or methods). In particular, Clark argued that the superiority of CBI over TI in comparison studies might have been either overestimated due to a failure to control
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
