
doi: 10.1007/bf02294707
handle: 11585/952913
In this paper robustness properties of the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) and several robust estimators for the logistic regression model when the responses are binary are analysed. It is found that the MLE and the classical Rao's score test can be misleading in the presence of model misspecification which in the context of logistic regression means either misclassification's errors in the responses, or extreme data points in the design space. A general framework for robust estimation and testing is presented and a robust estimator as well as a robust testing procedure are presented. It is shown that they are less influenced by model misspecifications than their classical counterparts. They are finally applied to the analysis of binary data from a study on breastfeeding.
Influence function, Misclassification, 330, breastfeeding, logistic regression, misclassification, influence function, logistic regression, misclassification, robust statistics, Mestimators, Rao's score test, influence function, breastfeeding, Breastfeeding, Logistic regression, Robust statistics, Mestimators, M-estimators, 310, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, robust statistics, Robustness and adaptive procedures (parametric inference), Rao's score test, 332/658, ddc: ddc:332/658, ddc: ddc:330
Influence function, Misclassification, 330, breastfeeding, logistic regression, misclassification, influence function, logistic regression, misclassification, robust statistics, Mestimators, Rao's score test, influence function, breastfeeding, Breastfeeding, Logistic regression, Robust statistics, Mestimators, M-estimators, 310, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, robust statistics, Robustness and adaptive procedures (parametric inference), Rao's score test, 332/658, ddc: ddc:332/658, ddc: ddc:330
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 20 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
