
doi: 10.1007/bf02294582
The usual convergence proof of the SMACOF algorithm model for least squares multidimensional scaling critically depends on the assumption of nonnegativity of the quantities to be fitted, called the pseudodistances. When this assumption is violated, erratic convergence behavior is known to occur. Three types of circumstances in which some of the pseudodistances may become negative are outlined: nonmetric multidimensional scaling with normalization on the variance, metric multidimensional scaling including an additive constant, and multidimensional scaling under the city-block distance model. A generalization of the SMACOF method is proposed to resolve the difficulty that is based on the same rationale frequently involved in robust fitting with least absolute residuals.
monotone convergence, least absolute residuals, Numerical methods for mathematical programming, optimization and variational techniques, metric multidimensional scaling, additive constant, negative pseudodistances, robust fitting, One- and multidimensional scaling in the social and behavioral sciences, least squares multidimensional scaling, city-block distance model, SMACOF algorithm
monotone convergence, least absolute residuals, Numerical methods for mathematical programming, optimization and variational techniques, metric multidimensional scaling, additive constant, negative pseudodistances, robust fitting, One- and multidimensional scaling in the social and behavioral sciences, least squares multidimensional scaling, city-block distance model, SMACOF algorithm
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 22 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
