
doi: 10.1007/bf01517360
We give a combinatorial proof that\(\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} a \\ k \\ \end{array} } \right]_q \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} b \\ l \\ \end{array} } \right]_q - \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} a \\ {k - 1} \\ \end{array} } \right]_q \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} b \\ {l + 1} \\ \end{array} } \right]_q \) is a polynomial inq with nonnegative coefficients for nonnegative integersa, b, k, l witha≥b andl≥k. In particular, fora=b=n andl=k, this implies theq-log-concavity of the Gaussian binomial coefficients\(\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} n \\ k \\ \end{array} } \right]_q \), which was conjectured byButler (Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 101 (1987), 771–775).
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 20 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
