
doi: 10.1007/bf01228507
Many tests for primality of \(n\) first require the elimination of the case where \(n\) is a perfect \(k\)-th power. This is negligible compared with the main primality routines, so it is usually ignored. There is a rich variety of methods including Newton's root extraction with starting value found by counting digits, modular tests for \(k\) power and search for small prime divisors (for elimination). On a more sophisticated level there is the (logarithmic number of) parallel processors, and the ERH to bound the trial moduli for power tests. (This requires a small table for efficiency.) The worst case is \(O(\log^ 3 n)\), the average is \(O(\log^ 2 n)\), and \(O(\log n)\) is the median.
Primality, sieve algorithm, Newton's method, Theory and Algorithms, Number Theory, Complexity classes (hierarchies, relations among complexity classes, etc.), parallel algorithms, average-case analysis
Primality, sieve algorithm, Newton's method, Theory and Algorithms, Number Theory, Complexity classes (hierarchies, relations among complexity classes, etc.), parallel algorithms, average-case analysis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
