
There is an old philosophical argument based upon the assumption that a good design presupposes an intelligent agency. If we encounter efficient machines, we must assume an intelligent planner. In the nineteenth century, biologists discounted this assumption. Suppose, they argued, structural changes do occur in living organisms by chance only. Nevertheless, the changes which register will be mostly in a given direction, since those less efficiently designed will not survive. In this way, highly efficient and extraordinarily complicated designs will “evolve” without any intelligent planning simply because (1) the capacity to survive is a “scoring” mechanism and (2) in a long interval of time there will be many generations.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 32 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 0.01% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
