
doi: 10.1007/bf00373575
The methods used by earlier workers for evaluating material balance in core-mantle-matrix type differentiated systems are examined in detail. It is demonstrated that these methods can be successfully employed only when the true core-mantle volume ratio is known. On geometric grounds, it is rarely possible to have a reliable estimate of this ratio from natural specimen. Consequently, the scope of balance evaluation by these methods is severely restricted. From theoretical consideration of mass transfer relations in differentiated systems, a new computational method is proposed that can be effectively employed for quantitative balance evaluation without any prior knowledge of the core-mantle volume ratio provided the chemical analyses of the core, mantle and matrix are available. This method involves the application of the following mass balance equation: $$m_1 x_1^i + m_2 x_2^i = m_0 x_0^i {\text{ (}}i = {\text{1,2}}...{\text{,}}n{\text{)}}$$ where m 1 and m 2 are the mass of the core and mantle respectively, m 0 is the mass of the matrix involved in differentiation, and x 1 , x 2 , x 0 are the weight fractions of the component i in the core, mantle and matrix respectively. This method would also permit a quantitative estimation of the materials added to or removed from the system. Three differentiated systems previously investigated by Mehnert (1951, 1968), Loberg (1963) and Kretz (1966) are selected for balance evaluation by the proposed method and the results are compared with the published balance analyses.
550.geology, Article
550.geology, Article
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
