
doi: 10.1007/bf00115636
pmid: 8850433
Epidemiologic evidence on the relation between nutrition and esophageal cancer is reviewed. Results from ecologic, case-control, cohort, and intervention studies are included. Most of the findings pertain more to squamous cell carcinoma than adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. The protective effect of fruit and vegetable consumption is supported by a large body of evidence, especially from case-control studies. The effects of food groups and nutrients other than fruits and vegetables also have been examined, but the overall evidence is less convincing. Recent intervention studies in high incidence areas in China indicate that micronutrient supplements may have a modest effect in reducing risk, but the generalizability of this result is uncertain. Hot drinks are likely to increase the risk of esophageal cancer. On the other hand, the role of tea drinking, especially the use of green tea, remains to be defined better.
China, Hot Temperature, Esophageal Neoplasms, Tea, Adenocarcinoma, Diet, Beverages, Cohort Studies, Risk Factors, Case-Control Studies, Fruit, Vegetables, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Humans, Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
China, Hot Temperature, Esophageal Neoplasms, Tea, Adenocarcinoma, Diet, Beverages, Cohort Studies, Risk Factors, Case-Control Studies, Fruit, Vegetables, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell, Humans, Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 117 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
