Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

The Sensitivity of the Conjunctiva

Authors: Jörg Draeger;

The Sensitivity of the Conjunctiva

Abstract

It has been known for a long time that similar to the cornea the conjunctiva possesses less discrimination between various Stimuli than the skin. According to v. Frey and Strughold (1926) only touch and pain sensations can be elicited from the cornea; the conjunctiva has in addition a sensation for cold which we shall, however, not consider in this monograph. Previous authors (v. Frey and Strughold, 1926; Boberg-Ans, 1955; Norn, 1973) agreed that the threshold for touch sensation is in the conjunctiva considerably higher than in the cornea. The authors also agreed that there are regional differences. Especially in the horizontal meridian the differences in the thresholds may reach 100–200%; the higher thresholds are found close to the limbus; the lower ones in the nasal or temporal periphery (v. Frey and Strughold, 1926). Norn (1973) did not examine many conjunctival points, but his results also reflect a certain regional variability in the thresholds. The various authors, however, found different absolute values for these thresholds which probably is due to the variety of examination methods used (compare also Norn, 1976). v. Frey and Strughold (1926) found that the threshold of the conjunctiva (30 g/mm2) was 150 times higher than the threshold of the cornea (0.2 g/mm2), whereas Norn (1976) found that the conjunctival threshold (8.48 g/mm2) was only 8 times higher than that of the cornea (1.06 g/mm2).

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!