
This chapter will define the genre of digital poetry and its components and also include a brief discussion of the history of digital poetry. As Hayles (How We Think, Digital Media and Contemporary Technogenesis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012: 13) tells us, digital texts can no longer be regarded as singular standalone objects rather they are constantly changing assemblages in which inequalities and inefficiencies in their operations drive them towards breakdown, disruption, innovation and change. The sharing economy of the internet, as it is termed, means that contemporary cultural content such as poetry cannot be separated from the communities and platforms that both form and read them. This chapter draws out the problematics of definition of the hybridic object that is a digital poem in order to situate the following chapters within an identifiable framework of practice.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
