
doi: 10.1007/11786986_15
Two variants of pebble tree-walking automata on trees are considered that were introduced in the literature. It is shown that for each number of pebbles, the two models have the same expressive power both in the deterministic case and in the nondeterministic case. Furthermore, nondeterministic (resp. deterministic) tree-walking automata with n + 1 pebbles can recognize more languages than those with n pebbles. Moreover, there is a regular tree language that is not recognized by any tree- walking automaton with pebbles. As a consequence, FO+posTC is strictly included in MSO over trees.
[INFO.INFO-CL] Computer Science [cs]/Computation and Language [cs.CL]
[INFO.INFO-CL] Computer Science [cs]/Computation and Language [cs.CL]
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
