
The authors prove the following interesting inequality for convex functions: Suppose that positive numbers \(s_{i,j}\) \((i= 0,1,2; j= 1,\dots,n)\) satisfy \(s_{1,j}\leq s_{0,j}\leq s_{2,j}\) \((j= 1,\dots,n)\) and \(a_ j s^{-1}_{i,1}+ b_ j s^{-1}_{i,j}= 1\) \((i= 0,1,2; j= 2,\dots,n)\) for positive constants \(a_ j\), \(b_ j\) \((j= 2,\dots,n)\). If \(f_ j: (0,\infty)\to \mathbb{R}\) \((j= 1,\dots,n)\) are convex functions, then \[ \sum^ n_{j=1} f_ j(s_{0,j})/s_{0,j}\leq \max_{i=1,2} \left(\sum^ n_{j=1} f_ j(s_{i,j})/s_{i,j}\right). \] Some connected results are also given.
convex functions, inequality, Applied Mathematics, Inequalities for sums, series and integrals, Convexity of real functions in one variable, generalizations, Analysis
convex functions, inequality, Applied Mathematics, Inequalities for sums, series and integrals, Convexity of real functions in one variable, generalizations, Analysis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
