Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Rate of Leaf Appearance and Final Number of Leaves in Wheat: Effects of Duration and Rate of Change of Photoperiod

Authors: G Slafer;

Rate of Leaf Appearance and Final Number of Leaves in Wheat: Effects of Duration and Rate of Change of Photoperiod

Abstract

This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that photoperiod or its rate of change significantly affects the rate of leaf appearance (RLA) and final number of leaves (FNL) in wheat, as suggested from several time-of-sowing experiments. Two wheat cultivars (Condor and Thatcher) were sown in the field on 2 Sep. 1992 at Melbourne (38°S). Photoperiod was extended artificially to give five treatments up to terminal spikelet initiation (TS) viz.: natural photoperiod (rate of change of photoperiod = 2 min d-1), two faster rates of change (8·5 and 13·3 min d-1) and two constant photoperiods of 14·0 and 15·5 h. After TS, the two constant photoperiods were extended to 15·0 and 16·5 h, respectively, and treatments were re-randomised, i.e. some plots received different photoperiod regimes before and after TS. The rate of leaf appearance maintained strong linear relationships with thermal time. It was greater for Condor [0·012-0·013 (°C d)-1] than for Thatcher [0·011-0·012 (°C d)-1] and did not alter during plant development or in response to the change in photoperiod at TS. Rate of leaf appearance on the main culm was not influenced by the rate of change of photoperiod nor by the average photoperiod. Cultivar and photoperiod significantly affected FNL on the main culm. Condor produced more leaves than Thatcher under long but not under short photoperiods. The rate of change of photoperiod did not affect FNL independently of the effect of average photoperiod. Most of the variation in FNL due to photoperiod resulted from differences in duration of leaf initiation. The lack of effects of the photoperiod treatments on RLA contrast with previous reports of its effects on the rate of phasic development from seedling emergence to double ridge. Therefore, the number of visible leaves on the main culm (NL) at double ridge and at TS were not constant. However, NL on the main culm at double ridge was closely correlated with FNL.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    31
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
31
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!