Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Wildlife Society Bul...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Article . 2017 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Wildlife Society Bulletin
Article . 2017
Data sources: DOAJ
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Greater sage‐grouse male lek counts relative to a wind energy development

Authors: Chad W. Lebeau; Jeffrey L. Beck; Gregory D. Johnson; Ryan M. Nielson; Matthew J. Holloran; Kenneth G. Gerow; Trent L. McDonald;

Greater sage‐grouse male lek counts relative to a wind energy development

Abstract

ABSTRACT Wind energy development is an emerging source of anthropogenic disturbance that could affect greater sage‐grouse ( Centrocercus urophasianus ; sage‐grouse) populations. Our objective was to determine the response of male sage‐grouse attending leks (lek counts) to wind energy development using a before/after–control/treatment study design. We counted males attending each lek within control and treatment areas annually and analyzed peak numbers. We obtained lek count data from 5 treatment and 9 control leks over an 11‐year period. We estimated trends in lek counts pre‐ (2006–2008) and postdevelopment (2009–2016) using a generalized linear mixed negative binomial model. We considered time lags at which the effect of the wind energy development was realized by the male breeding population. Although all lek counts were apparently in decline prior to development and trends on the control and treatment area changed during postdevelopment, we found no negative differences in the relative trends in lek counts between control and treatment areas between pre‐ and postdevelopment periods. We detected a 56% drop in lek counts at treatment leks relative to control leks assuming the effect of the wind energy development was realized between 2010 and 2011 (i.e., 3 yr postdevelopment). Use of a posteriori power analysis estimated similar data sets would have 80% probability of detecting a 28% decrease in the rate of decline of lek counts at treatment leks relative to control leks after development. Our findings suggest males attending leks in close proximity to wind energy development may respond differently compared with leks in close proximity to other forms of anthropogenic features, adding to a growing body of literature regarding the potential effects of energy development on prairie grouse. We recommend additional research and an abundance of caution in designating buffer sizes <1.5 km to avoid measurable effects from wind energy development on males attending leks. © 2017 The Wildlife Society.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Centrocercus urophasianus, wind energy development, lek counts, wind turbines, General. Including nature conservation, geographical distribution, greater sage‐grouse, QH1-199.5

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    14
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
14
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
gold