
pmid: 11590631
AbstractIn the case‐crossover design, only cases are sampled and the hazard ratio is estimated from within‐subject comparisons of exposures at the event time and in M control periods prior to the event. We consider the effect of within‐subject dependence of exposures in successive time periods. We show that estimates obtained from the conditional logistic model are biased. This bias disappears if the distribution of exposures in the M+1 successive time intervals is exchangeable. In contrast, the Mantel–Haenszel estimator for the odds ratio is approximately unbiased provided that exposures are stationary. Suitable methods of analysis of case‐crossover designs using maximum likelihood may be derived from cohort rather than case‐control models. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Likelihood Functions, Cross-Over Studies, Logistic Models, Bias, Case-Control Studies, Humans
Likelihood Functions, Cross-Over Studies, Logistic Models, Bias, Case-Control Studies, Humans
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 44 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
