
doi: 10.1002/sim.913
pmid: 11590634
AbstractSurvival time prediction is important in many applications, particularly for patients diagnosed with terminal diseases. A measure of prediction error taken from the medical literature is advocated as a practicable method of quantifying reliability of point predictions. Optimum predictions are derived for familiar survival models and the accuracy of these predictions is investigated. We argue that poor predictive capability is inherent to standard survival models with realistic parameter values. A lung cancer example is used to illustrate difficulties in prediction in practice. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Terminal Care, Lung Neoplasms, Models, Statistical, 610, Prognosis, Severity of Illness Index, Survival Analysis, Life Expectancy, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Humans
Terminal Care, Lung Neoplasms, Models, Statistical, 610, Prognosis, Severity of Illness Index, Survival Analysis, Life Expectancy, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Humans
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 51 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
