
doi: 10.1002/sim.7446
pmid: 28857229
Demonstrating bioequivalence of several pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, such asAUCandCmax, that are calculated from the same biological sample measurements is in fact a multivariate problem, even though this is neglected by most practitioners and regulatory bodies, who typically settle for separate univariate analyses. We believe, however, that a truly multivariate evaluation of all PK measures simultaneously is clearly more adequate. In this paper, we review methods to construct joint confidence regions around multivariate normal means and investigate their usefulness in simultaneous bioequivalence problems via simulation. Some of them work well for idealised scenarios but break down when faced with real‐data challenges such as unknown variance and correlation among the PK parameters. We study the shapes of the confidence regions resulting from different methods, discuss how marginal simultaneous confidence intervals for the individual PK measures can be derived, and illustrate the application to data from a trial on ticlopidine hydrochloride. An R package is available.
Cross-Over Studies, Ticlopidine, James-Stein estimator, Chemistry, Pharmaceutical, 310, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, limaçon of Pascal, Therapeutic Equivalency, Area Under Curve, Multivariate Analysis, Confidence Intervals, Humans, Computer Simulation, simultaneous inference, bioavailability, TOST
Cross-Over Studies, Ticlopidine, James-Stein estimator, Chemistry, Pharmaceutical, 310, Applications of statistics to biology and medical sciences; meta analysis, limaçon of Pascal, Therapeutic Equivalency, Area Under Curve, Multivariate Analysis, Confidence Intervals, Humans, Computer Simulation, simultaneous inference, bioavailability, TOST
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
