
AbstractMultivariate analysis in case‐base designs depends on approximate methods. In the present study, new pseudo‐likelihood methods are developed for this design. With these methods, the case‐cohort risk ratio and rate ratio as well as their standard errors are easily estimated using logistic regression and Poisson regression, respectively. This is illustrated by the association between hypertension and cardiovascular mortality in a cohort, estimated by case‐cohort analysis, using samples of several sizes. The estimates are compared with those obtained in full‐cohort and nested case‐control designs. The results indicate that these methods, which require nothing but widely available computer software, are valid. The case‐cohort design, therefore, is a good, sometimes even advantageous alternative to the nested case‐control design, in studying a disease that is not very rare. Application of the risk ratio method to the full cohort, using a ‘sample’ of 100 per cent follows logically; whenever the true risk ratio is desired instead of the odds ratio, a multivariate model for its estimation is therefore available.
Adult, Male, Risk, Models, Statistical, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, Survival Analysis, Cohort Studies, Cardiovascular Diseases, Case-Control Studies, Cause of Death, Multivariate Analysis, Hypertension, Odds Ratio, Life Science, Regression Analysis, Humans, Aged, Netherlands
Adult, Male, Risk, Models, Statistical, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, Survival Analysis, Cohort Studies, Cardiovascular Diseases, Case-Control Studies, Cause of Death, Multivariate Analysis, Hypertension, Odds Ratio, Life Science, Regression Analysis, Humans, Aged, Netherlands
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 71 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
