
doi: 10.1002/rsa.20772
AbstractThe edge‐percolation and vertex‐percolation random graph models start with an arbitrary graphG, and randomly delete edges or vertices ofGwith some fixed probability. We study the computational complexity of problems whose inputs are obtained by applying percolation to worst‐case instances. Specifically, we show that a number of classical‐hard problems on graphs remain essentially as hard on percolated instances as they are in the worst‐case (assuming). We also prove hardness results for other‐hard problems such as Constraint Satisfaction Problems and Subset‐Sum, with suitable definitions of random deletions. Along the way, we establish that foranygiven graphGthe independence numberand the chromatic numberare robust to percolation in the following sense. Given a graphG, letbe the graph obtained by randomly deleting edges ofGwith some probability. We show that ifis small, thenremains small with probability at least 0.99. Similarly, we show that ifis large, thenremains large with probability at least 0.99. We believe these results are of independent interest.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
