
doi: 10.1002/qre.586
handle: 11245/1.213039
AbstractSeveral control charts for individual observations are compared. Traditional ones are the well‐known Shewhart individuals control charts based on moving ranges. Alternative ones are non‐parametric control charts based on empirical quantiles, on kernel estimators, and on extreme‐value theory. Their in‐control and out‐of‐control performance are studied by simulation combined with computation. It turns out that the alternative control charts are not only quite robust against deviations from normality but also perform reasonably well under normality of the observations. The performance of the Empirical Quantile control chart is excellent for all distributions considered, if the Phase I sample is sufficiently large. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
330, 620
330, 620
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 30 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
