
doi: 10.1002/qj.2070
AbstractThe problem of variational data assimilation for a nonlinear evolution model is formulated as an optimal control problem to find the initial condition function (analysis). The data contain errors (observation and background errors); hence there is an error in the analysis. For mildly nonlinear dynamics the analysis error covariance can be approximated by the inverse Hessian of the cost functional in the auxiliary data assimilation problem, and for stronger nonlinearity by the ‘effective’ inverse Hessian. However, it has been noticed that the analysis error covariance is not the posterior covariance from the Bayesian perspective. While these two are equivalent in the linear case, the difference may become significant in practical terms with the nonlinearity level rising. For the proper Bayesian posterior covariance a new approximation via the Hessian is derived and its ‘effective’ counterpart is introduced. An approach for computing the mentioned estimates in the matrix‐free environment using the Lanczos method with preconditioning is suggested. Numerical examples which validate the developed theory are presented for the model governed by Burgers equation with a nonlinear viscous term.
analysis error covariance, large-scale flow models, Hessian, Environmental engineering, 510, nonlinear dynamics, optimal control, [MATH.MATH-MP]Mathematics [math]/Mathematical Physics [math-ph], TA170, [MATH.MATH-MP] Mathematics [math]/Mathematical Physics [math-ph], data assimilation, Bayesian posterior covariance
analysis error covariance, large-scale flow models, Hessian, Environmental engineering, 510, nonlinear dynamics, optimal control, [MATH.MATH-MP]Mathematics [math]/Mathematical Physics [math-ph], TA170, [MATH.MATH-MP] Mathematics [math]/Mathematical Physics [math-ph], data assimilation, Bayesian posterior covariance
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 33 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
