AbstractBACKGROUNDThe commercialization of dicamba‐resistant soybean has resulted in increased concern for off‐target movement of dicamba onto sensitive vegetation. To mitigate the off‐target movement through physical drift, one might consider use of rope wicks and other wiper applicators. Although wiper‐type application methods have been efficacious in pasture settings, the utility of dicamba using wiper applicators in agronomic crops is not available in scientific literature. To determine the utility of roller wipers for dicamba applications in dicamba‐resistant soybean, two separate experiments were conducted in the summer of 2020 and replicated in both Keiser and Fayetteville, AR, USA.RESULTSUtilizing opposing application directions and a 2:1:1 ratio of water: formulated glyphosate: formulated dicamba were the most efficacious practices for controlling Palmer amaranth. The high herbicide concentrations and wiping in opposing directions increased dicamba‐resistant soybean injury when the wiper contacted the crop, but no yield loss was observed because of this injury. Broadcast applications resulted in greater Palmer amaranth mortality than roller wiper applications, and the most effective roller wiper treatments were when two sequential applications were made inside the crop canopy.CONCLUSIONSDicamba applications require adequate coverage for optimum weed control. While efforts can be made to increase roller wiper efficacy by optimizing coverage and timing of applications, broadcast applications are superior to roller wiper applicators for weed control. Roller wiper applications did not reduce soybean yield, thus wiper‐type applications may be safely used in dicamba‐resistant soybean, albeit the likelihood for off‐target damage caused by volatilization of these treatments would need to be investigated. © 2022 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.