
doi: 10.1002/ps.1456
pmid: 17912682
AbstractThe behaviour of sulcotrione, a recently introduced triketone herbicide, in various soil types was studied under laboratory conditions. In particular, degradation and sorption processes were examined on Ghent and Perpignan soils. Kinetics showed that the degradation of sulcotrione was influenced by biotic and/or abiotic factors. Half‐lives ranged between 45 and 65 days. Among the degradation compounds identified were 1,3‐cyclohexanedione (CHD) and 2‐chloro‐4‐mesyl benzoic acid (CMBA), previously described as hydrolysis products, and, under special conditions, a derivative of phenylheptanoic acid (PHD). This new degradation product suggested that sulcotrione could follow two possible pathways in the soil, as in water. During the sorption study, a moderate retention of sulcotrione and CMBA relative to CHD and PHD, which were highly adsorbed whatever the soil type, was reported. Experiments carried out under the same conditions for sulcotrione and mesotrione, another triketone herbicide recommended in maize culture, made it possible to compare the two triketones and to conclude that they exhibited relatively similar behaviour in the soil, i.e. that their leaching potential needs to be properly addressed and risks evaluated. Copyright © 2007 Society of Chemical Industry
Mesylates, [CHIM.ANAL] Chemical Sciences/Analytical chemistry, Time Factors, Molecular Structure, Degradation product, Cyclohexanones, Herbicides, Degradation, Soil, Triketone, Soils, Sorption, Herbicide, Pesticides, Half-Life
Mesylates, [CHIM.ANAL] Chemical Sciences/Analytical chemistry, Time Factors, Molecular Structure, Degradation product, Cyclohexanones, Herbicides, Degradation, Soil, Triketone, Soils, Sorption, Herbicide, Pesticides, Half-Life
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 64 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
